wReck thiS meSS ~ Radio Patapoe 88.3 ~ Amsterdam
8 september 2008 // 17.00-19.00
Stars & Stripes Forever > Matmos 
American Achievements > Millions of Dead Cops 
How To Pray > Savage Vigilance [Church of Subgenius] 
Mirror Man Speaks / Mirror Man Sees > Pale Orchestra conducted by David Thomas 
Christian Abortionist > Savage Vigilance [Church of Subgenius] 
Lost Nation Road > Pale Orchestra conducted by David Thomas 
Living in the USA > Steve Miller Band 
American Night > Jim Morrison 
The Flying Dutchman of the Interstate > Pale Orchestra conducted by David Thomas 
Brownsville Turnaround on the Tex-Mex Border > KLF 
Ballad of Florida > Pale Orchestra conducted by David Thomas 
When It Rains In Texas, It Snows on the Rhine > FSK 
Pulling out of Ricardo & the Dusk is Falling Fast > KLF 
Edelweiss > Tuba Meisters 
Montana / Ribbons on the Road > Pale Orchestra conducted by David Thomas 
Freddy Fender’s Sohn > FSK 
Back in Huntsville Again > Bobby Bare 
Happy Birthday Texas > Pure Sound 
Morbid Sky Ballad of Florida > Pale Orchestra conducted by David Thomas 
No Safety Zone > Ry Cooder 
Dozing Drunkards [Vivaldi] > Willem Breuker Kollektief 
Houston in 2 Seconds > Ry Cooder 
Homesickness > Willem Breuker Kollektief 
Cantina Theme > Bob Dylan 
Oklahoma Blues > Frankie Marvin 
The Hitchhiker > Jim Morrison 
Weird Cornfields > Pale Orchestra conducted by David Thomas 
White Trash > Colter, Jennings, Dillon & Cash 
The Ultra GTO > Coachmen 
Love From Room 109 at the Islander (on Pacific Coast Highway) > Tim Buckley 
Indian > Marcelo Radulovich 
The South > Alistair Cooke 
Down Salinas Way > Coachmen 
Indian > Marcelo Radulovich 
 The Civil War: A User’s Guide, Matador, 2003.
 MDC, We Bite vinyl.
 Savage vigilance for a Drug-Free America, Electro Motive, 1992.
 Mirror Man, Cooking Vinyl, 2003.
 Steve Miller Band Anthology, Capitol vinyl, 1972.
 An American Prayer, Elektra vinyl 1978. “Well, I woke up this mornin’ / got myself a beer…”
 Chill Out, Great samplethon soundscape, paragon shift, parakeet drift.
 Son of Kraut, Sub Up, 1991. This Mekons-esque, shockabilly-oid german band recorded this in Richmond, VA. A friend from there thought it important to mention.
 Texas Bohemia: Polkas, Waltzes, Schottisches, Trikont, 1994. Field recordings by FSK’s Thomas Meinecke, some-time yodeler.
 Country Club, RCA vinyl, 1976.
 Yukon, Euphonium, 2006.
 Paris, Texas, Warner Brothers vinyl, 1985.
 Willem Breuker Kollektief at Ruta Maya Cafe, Austin, Texas, BVHaast, 2006.
 Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid, Columbia vinyl, 1973,
 Golden Age of Frankie Marvin, Cattle, 2000.
 White Mansions: A Tale from the American Civil War, A&M, 1978/1989.
 Mercy, Label-less, 2008. Is Squeaky Fromme really playing bass on this album?
 Happy / Sad, Electra, 1968?.
 Index, Titicacamen, 2006.
 Talk About America, Pye, 1974.
• The elections are over and one can only hope that Obama tells the American people that it will not be enough to have simply voted for him to have their doubts about their lifestyles put to rest [4% of the world’s population 24% of the world’s consumption/pollution]. It is as if America went not to the polls but to a confessional to be absolved of their sins, guilt, crimes against themselves. It is feelgood politics at its most elementary. A man who has promoted his own appeasement qualities and abilities to ‘understand’ the right and even sympathize with their issues is now the man of change.
There is a car named Trooper, another called Charade, a sanitary napkin called Freedom, drinks named after emotions and household cleaning products named after lofty ideals and now there is a lukewarm right of left, proudly centrist senator who has a history of avoiding change in the name of the status quo has reinvented himself as the agent of change and this has led him to the White House. All those who want change so badly should have at least looked at or listened to some of those on the far left who have been talking about their issues for 8 years or 28 years. But no, they prefer to be told that they will have to make few hard choices if they just vote for Mr. Feelgood. They have righted all their jingoist consumerist wrongs by voting for Mr. Right.
Anyway, the egotistical and self-absorbed electorate [most of my friends and acquaintances excepted] can now go back to their comfortable thoughts that the whole world was watching them as the most important people in the world [the coverage on the BBC, french tv, the Dutch media was extreme and thus totally accommodated this view – it was Obama/US fever with Dutch journalists, for instance, having done major profiles of places like Canton Ohio, major coverage of PA and its people and what they are thinking plus correspondents in DC. Our volkskrant paper has had the US election on the front page for a month now and has been covering the elections regularly for about 2 years]. One can only hope that Obama and his fans will open up and look at the rest of the world and become a little bit more modest and realize that they are actually NOT the center of the universe regardless of CNN and MTV and Hollywood and that modesty [you would expect that from the self-proclaimed – ironically enough – ‘most religious country in the world] but I fear that Obama is for unilateral cultural/military hegemony [in the name of world peace. And what did the election process cost in terms of time, money, energy, environmental impact, distraction from issues… well probably about a billion dollars!! and who knows what the other damage is… As Michael Moore proposed 8 weeks and out.
• On 5 Nov 2008 Dr. Dr. Jazz D.D.S. wrote: Just got home and voted before I saw your email. I’m happy to say I voted for Cynthia McKinney (an African-American female, take that obama). of the Green Party (a female Hispanic V.P. also, take that Palin) I feel I’ll be able to sleep soundly as a result of this. I watch “Democracy Now” regularly, listen to Air America a lot, and listen to the editor of the Nation magazine all endorsing Obama but always with the caveat that hopefully he’ll abandon his “left center” Clintonesque positions and track left (while he’s no history of this) now that he’s elected. I don’t know from where this Pollyanna optimism comes from. Not convincing enough. He’s just another politician from where I stand and in the end I just couldn’t pull his lever (or fill in the oval on our optically scanned ballot). I have to admit it felt awfully good to do this. Hopefully though McCain will lose because we can’t have him picking the Supremes. Although in a certain sense I would like him to win because I feel the only real progress can come from total collapse as there seems to be a complete inability of the politicians of this country to be forward looking. Nader was on the National Law party ticket and while I can’t site their ideology I seem remember being at odds with it when it heard some of its tenets. More of Nader’s opportunism to get on this party’s ticket. Free Speech TV inter-cut a replay of McCain/Obama debates with responses of third party candidates and McKinney is pretty close to Nader and Kucinich. Thanks for the videos., I’m gonna watch them now. I heard this guy speak on the radio, Dan Barker, and his book “Godless” sounds interesting. Its next on my pile after I finish the medieval Icelandic Sagas with lots of plundering and burying of axes in people’s skulls. (best images so far: “the ground was clad in a cloak of blood” and “some claimed they could hear him count ‘eleven’ as his head went flying though the air”
Throwing my vote away (as always), Dr. Dr. Jazz
• Chris Hedges usually speaks the agonizing truths: Only Nader Is Right on the Issues
Posted on Nov 3, 2008 Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer prize-winning journalist who has covered many wars around the world. His column appears Mondays on Truthdig.
Tomorrow I will go to a polling station in Princeton, N.J., and vote for Ralph Nader. I know the tired arguments against a Nader vote. He can’t win. A vote for Nader is a vote for McCain. He threw the election to George W. Bush in 2000. He is an egomaniac. There is little disagreement among liberals and progressives about the Nader and Obama campaign issues. Nader would win among us in a landslide if this was based on issues. Sen. Barack Obama’s vote to renew the Patriot Act, his votes to continue to fund the Iraq war, his backing of the FISA Reform Act, his craven courting of the Israeli lobby, his support of the death penalty, his refusal to champion universal, single-payer not-for-profit health care for all Americans, his call to increase troop levels and expand the war in Afghanistan, his failure to call for a reduction in the bloated and wasteful defense spending and his lobbying for the huge taxpayer swindle known as the bailout are repugnant to most of us on the left. Nader stands on the other side of all those issues.
So if the argument is not about issues what is it about? Those on the left who back Obama, although they disagree with much of what he promotes, believe they are choosing the practical over the moral. They see themselves as political realists. They fear John McCain and the Republicans. They believe Obama is better for the country. They are right. Obama is better. He is not John McCain. There will be under Obama marginal improvements for some Americans although the corporate state, as Obama knows, will remain our shadow government and the working class will continue to descend into poverty. Democratic administrations have, at least until Bill Clinton, been more receptive to social programs that provide benefits, better working conditions and higher wages. An Obama presidency, however, will make no difference to those in the Middle East.
I can’t join the practical. I spent two decades of my life witnessing the suffering of those on the receiving end of American power. I have stood over the rows of bodies, including women and children, butchered by Ronald Reagan’s Contra forces in Nicaragua. I have inspected the mutilated corpses dumped in pits outside San Salvador by the death squads. I have crouched in a concrete hovel as American-made F-16 fighter jets, piloted by Israelis, dropped 500- and 1,000-pound iron-fragmentation bombs on Gaza City. I can’t join the practical because I do not see myself exclusively as an American. The narrow, provincial and national lines that divide cultures and races blurred and evaporated during the years I spent in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, Europe and the Balkans. I built friendships around a shared morality, not a common language, religion, history or tradition. I cannot support any candidate who does not call for immediate withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan and an end to Israeli abuse of Palestinians. We have no moral or legal right to debate the terms of the occupation. And we will recover our sanity as a nation only when our troops have left Iraq and our president flies to Baghdad, kneels before a monument to the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi war dead and asks for forgiveness.
We dismiss the suffering of others because it is not our suffering. There are between 600,000 and perhaps a million dead in Iraq. They died because we invaded and occupied their country. At least three Afghan civilians have died at the hands of the occupation forces for every foreign soldier killed this year. The dead Afghans include the 95 people, 60 of them children, killed by an air assault in Azizabad in August and the 47 wedding guests butchered in July during a bombardment in Nangarhar. The Palestinians are forgotten. Obama and McCain, courting the Israeli lobby, do not mention them. The 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza live in a vast open-air prison. Supplies and food dribble through the Israeli blockade. Ninety-five percent of local industries have shut down. Unemployment is rampant. Childhood malnutrition has skyrocketed. A staggering 80 percent of families in Gaza are dependent on international food aid to survive. It is bad enough that I pay taxes, although I will stop paying taxes if we go to war with Iran. It is bad enough that I have retreated into a safe, privileged corner of the globe, a product of industrialized wealth and militarism. These are enough moral concessions, indeed moral failings. I will not accept that the unlawful use of American military power be politely debated among us like the subtle pros and cons of tort law.
George Bush has shredded, violated or absented America from its obligations under international law. He has refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol, backed out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, tried to kill the International Criminal Court, walked out on negotiations on chemical and biological weapons and defied the Geneva Conventions and human rights law in the treatment of detainees in our offshore penal colonies. Most egregiously, he launched an illegal war in Iraq based on fabricated evidence we now know had been discredited even before it was made public. The president is guilty, in short, of what in legal circles is known as the “crime of aggression.” The legacy of the Bush administration may be the codification of a world without treaties, statutes and laws. Bush may have bequeathed to us a world where any nation, from a rogue nuclear state to a great imperial power, will be able to invoke its domestic laws to annul its obligations to others. This new order will undo five decades of international cooperation—largely put in place by the United States—and thrust us into a Hobbesian nightmare. The exercise of power without law is tyranny.
If we demolish the fragile and delicate international order, if we do not restore a world where diplomacy, broad cooperation and the law are respected, we will see our moral and political authority disintegrate. We will erode the possibility of cooperation between nation-states, including our closest allies, and see visited upon us the evils we visit on others. Obama, like McCain, may tinker with this new world, but neither says they will dismantle it. Nader would. Practical men and women do not stand up against injustice. The practical remain silent. A voice, even one voice, which speaks the truth and denounces injustice is never useless. It is not impractical. It reminds us of what we should strive to become. It defies moral concession after moral concession that leaves us chanting empty slogans.
When I sat on the summit of Mount Igman in my armored jeep, the engine idling, before nervously running the gantlet of Serb gunfire that raked the dirt road into the besieged city of Sarajevo, I never asked myself if what I was doing was practical. Forty-five foreign correspondents died in the city along with some 12,000 Bosnians, including 2,000 children. Some 50,000 people were wounded. Of the dead and wounded 85 percent were civilians. I drove down the slope into Sarajevo, which was being hit by 2,000 shells a day and under constant sniper fire, because what was happening there was a crime. I drove down because I had friends in the city. I did not want them to be alone. Their stories had become mine. War, with all its euphemisms about surges and the escalation of troops and collateral damage, is not an abstraction to me. I am haunted by hundreds of memories of violence and trauma. I have abandoned, because I no longer cover these conflicts, many I care about. They live in Gaza, Baghdad, Jerusalem, Beirut, Kabul and Tehran. They cannot vote in our election. They will, however, bear the consequences of our decision. Some, if the wars continue, may be injured or killed. The quest for justice is not about being practical. It is required by the bonds we share. They would do no less for me.
* Many of these are courtesy Black Sifichi & Laurent Panou in Paris.